journal of biomedical informatics
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Exploring the World of Structural Bioinformatics: Unraveling the Secrets of Proteins

Atilgan Bej*
 
Department of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, Email: bejatilgan@mail.com
 
*Correspondence: Atilgan Bej, Department of Chemistry, Georgia State University, USA, Email: bejatilgan@mail.com

, Manuscript No. ejbi-23-106225; QC No. ejbi-23-106225; , Manuscript No. ejbi-23-106225; Published: 30-Dec-2023

This open-access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits reuse, distribution and reproduction of the article, provided that the original work is properly cited and the reuse is restricted to noncommercial purposes. For commercial reuse, contact submissions@ejbi.org

European Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Introduction

In the vast and intricate realm of biology, proteins play a crucial role. These complex molecules are responsible for carrying out a wide range of functions within living organisms, from catalyzing chemical reactions to serving as structural components. Understanding the three-dimensional structure of proteins is paramount for unraveling their functions, interactions, and potential therapeutic applications. This is where the field of structural bioinformatics emerges, utilizing computational tools and techniques to study protein structures and their implications in various biological processes. Structural Bioinformatics Structural bioinformatics combines the principles of bioinformatics, which involves the application of computational methods to biological data, and structural biology, which focuses on elucidating the spatial arrangement of biomolecules. By harnessing the power of computers, scientists are able to investigate protein structures at a scale and speed that would be otherwise unattainable using traditional laboratory techniques alone [1].

Protein Structure Prediction

At the core of structural bioinformatics lies protein structure prediction. Despite significant advancements in experimental methods such as X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, determining the structure of every protein experimentally remains a challenging and timeconsuming task. Computational models and algorithms, on the other hand, provide a valuable alternative by predicting protein structures based on known principles and existing databases of protein structures. These predictions can guide experimental efforts and accelerate the process of understanding protein functions [2].

One of the key methods used in structural bioinformatics is homology modeling, also known as comparative modeling. This approach relies on the principle that proteins with similar sequences are likely to share similar structures and functions. By comparing the amino acid sequence of a target protein to a template protein with a known structure, computational algorithms can generate a model of the target protein‘s structure. Homology modeling has proven to be a valuable tool for predicting protein structures, particularly when experimental data is limited [3, 4].

Analysis of Protein-Protein Interactions

Another important aspect of structural bioinformatics is the analysis of protein-protein interactions. Proteins rarely work alone; they often interact with other proteins to carry out their functions. Understanding the structural details of these interactions can shed light on the underlying biological mechanisms and provide insights for drug discovery and development. Computational methods, such as docking and molecular dynamics simulations, can simulate protein-protein interactions and provide valuable information about their binding affinity, stability, and conformational changes [5, 6].

Furthermore, structural bioinformatics plays a crucial role in drug discovery and design. The three-dimensional structure of a protein can reveal potential binding sites for small molecules or drug compounds. Through virtual screening and molecular docking techniques, computational tools can identify potential drug candidates that bind to these sites and modulate protein function. This enables researchers to narrow down the search space and focus their experimental efforts on molecules with higher chances of success. Additionally, structural bioinformatics can aid in the design of novel drugs by modeling interactions between target proteins and potential drug molecules, allowing for rational drug design and optimization [7, 8].

The field of structural bioinformatics is rapidly evolving, driven by advances in computational power, data availability, and algorithm development. Large-scale initiatives such as the Protein Data Bank (PDB), which provides a comprehensive collection of experimentally determined protein structures, have fueled progress in this field. Additionally, machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques are being increasingly integrated into structural bioinformatics, enabling more accurate predictions and faster analysis of protein structures [9, 10].

Conclusion

In conclusion, structural bioinformatics has emerged as a vital discipline in modern biology, offering powerful tools and methodologies to study protein structures and their implications in biological processes. By combining computational approaches with experimental data, researchers can gain insights into the complex world of proteins and unlock their potential in areas such as drug discovery, personalized medicine, and understanding disease mechanisms. As technology continues to advance, structural bioinformatics is poised to revolutionize our understanding of proteins and contribute to significant advancements in the field of biology and medicine.

References

  1. Grant BJ, Rodrigues AP, ElSawy KM, McCammon JA, Caves LS. Bio3d: an R package for the comparative analysis of protein structures. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22(21):2695-6.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Caves LS, Evanseck JD, Karplus M. Locally accessible conformations of proteins: multiple molecular dynamics simulations of crambin. Protein Sci. 1998; 7(3):649-66.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Grant BJ, McCammon JA, Caves LS, Cross RA. Multivariate analysis of conserved sequence–structure relationships in kinesins: coupling of the active site and a tubulin-binding sub-domain. J Mol Biol. 2007; 368(5):1231-48.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Hinsen K, Petrescu AJ, Dellerue S, Bellissent-Funel MC, Kneller GR. Harmonicity in slow protein dynamics. Chem Phy. 2000; 261(1-2):25-37.

    5. Google Scholar

  5. Atilgan AR, Durell SR, Jernigan RL, Demirel MC, Keskin O, et al. Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophy J. 2001; 80(1):505-15.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Aimone JB, Wiles J, Gage FH. Potential role for adult neurogenesis in the encoding of time in new memories. Nat Neurosci. 2006; 9(6):723-7.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Alme CB, Buzzetti RA, Marrone DF, Leutgeb JK, Chawla MK, et al. Hippocampal granule cells opt for early retirement. Hippocampus. 2010; 20(10):1109-23.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Bakker A, Kirwan CB, Miller M, Stark CE. Pattern separation in the human hippocampal CA3 and dentate gyrus. Sci. 2008; 319(5870):1640-2.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Brun VH, Leutgeb S, Wu HQ, Schwarcz R, Witter MP, et al. Impaired spatial representation in CA1 after lesion of direct input from entorhinal cortex. Neuron. 2008; 57(2):290-302.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Chambers RA, Conroy SK. Network modeling of adult neurogenesis: shifting rates of neuronal turnover optimally gears network learning according to novelty gradient. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007; 19(1):1-2.

    11.  Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref